- Do not hate the optimism? We did. But we are not against the optimism and the idea that you can do better than you will with reasonable grounds, but the idea that we need to think positive and you'll be fine. Say, those people who play in the religion called "Happiness." Religion that does not base his theory in a real and achievable idea but a superstition. We, or am I going to say they thought they could be happy? If you truly believe, are more naive than we are. Become the idea that happiness can be found, but it will happen and it will go like wine and not saying you have to do to recover. The man's natural state is anxiety, sadness, melancholy, but not happiness. So are irritating these optimists, who lie, some disgusting. Eye, I say that not to do things, no, do them knowing that there will be more than happy for a while, a fictional look happiness when they return to their natural state of distress. Enjoy life without trying to be happy, do not be fooled by the prophets of optimism.
"Well, as there is nothing more human than the complaint, we will complain. Ah, Facebook, Facebook. It is unusual in this blog we play these types of issues or say these things, but Facebook provides for that. But let's give it a serious note, before you start. According to Douglas Rushkoff, media theory, it is healthy to question the technologies that surround us so we can see and understand the impact it has on our behaviors. To those who say it's not worth criticizing Facebook. Well, the first thing we say is that Facebook is boring, really. You never met face to the screen and said "this is stupid? Here, in the editor, passing the time. Even destroyed several keyboards and screens in sudden fits of rage. But seriously, there's nothing too interesting to do. Share material, for example, is something you can do, but what who cares what that interests you or your wedding picture or that music video eighties? No one, really, is a useless information superhighway. Then when you get tired of sharing nonsense there is nothing more to do and end up boring. Another thing is the labels Facebook. The most incomprehensible is the question "What are you thinking?" Who, maliciously, it makes the page. When looked at that, and several in the editor will feel the same, the first thing I think is "do you care that I'm thinking," or "I'm thinking nothing." Actually, the commentary can be done in that space is not "What I'm thinking" is only a comment. Think, shall we say, is something a bit more complex. But Facebook is atontecer usual words, meaning them out. For example, instead of "contacts" that would be the correct name, and have it on Facebook means a way to communicate with them well, instead of "Contacts", have "friends." In my case, I am a "friend" from "Breakfast Small Craft", but there are thousands of examples of the sort. Now, how to be "friend" of a business? Are we going to the movies with the business, we had a beer with the business? Are we called by phone to tell us that this love with the deli in the back? He imagined that everyone will agree that Most of our contacts on Facebook are not friends, are other things. Friend, how to think, before Facebook was a key word. Something similar, though not equal, the case with the idea of \u200b\u200b"like" and "I do not like." Divided the world of Facebook users into two groups "things I like" and "things that I like." There is no gray or middle ground, nor the idea that there are things you might like or not, but halfway. But even there, that is to say, excesses in Facebook, there are no excessive emotions, everything is cold, distant, no heart at times. Say, there is the "extraordinary" or "Brilliant" or "Cool" nor "Horrible" or "awful" or "stupid." The "Like", which prevents halftones, also precludes the excess, it is somewhat bland, cold definition in relation to something. Finally, and very personal way of complaint, "terribly irritating to us when those red squares with numbers on top of the screen that tell us anything new? They are truly disturbing.
-can you say you had a bad day when you stole a shoe weasel. And speaking of the same, what is better? What do you steal a shoe or stolen you both? Think about it.
"In the drafting of" Catch the Lord Pato ", we believe that the shortage of coins is a myth, really. Perhaps at some point there was a shortage, do not deny. But the issue is mediated, became flesh in people, was installed in the collective subconscious and now, so there is no scarcity, but scarcity paranoia, that is, fear that there may be shortages, so that both traders and people who are not, accounts for thinking that there's currencies. Naturally, the coins, to be hidden, are not in circulation and it reinforces the idea that there is a shortage. But there is no shortage.
"Another thing, how is the issue of inflation? Prices rise and a guy comes out and says "There is inflation," or leave a guy says "There is inflation," and begin to raise prices? As it is, eh?
0 comments:
Post a Comment