Whats The Strongest Gel

Liróforo Gabriel Velázquez The Toledo
The criminalization of culture

One of the most profitable businesses in the world of communication is the radio. Hundreds of motorists prefer to tune a station, to accompany the journeys they make and reduce the stress of traffic flow so slow that it is in the city due to the overcrowding of cars. The high impact that this medium is in the social mood is not comparable to any other yet, especially when the technical requirements for your line, do not require large expenditures.
Lately, disposal, next, the frequency of amplitude modulation (AM) is revealed as part of a strategy of big radio empires, this measure seeking to end competition from local and community radio stations, seeking to force to enter a market in which technical requirements are extremely expensive and beyond the reach of those who do not have the money to mount antennas and sophisticated equipment emission wave frequency modulation (FM).
As if this measure, disproportionate, in the name of "modernity" not enough, the repressive action of institutions involved in law enforcement, have lambasted the religious and cultural stations remain in the "clandestine", but they apply commercial use space allegedly "pirating." As is well known the permits to make commercial use, are extremely cumbersome and bureaucratic, created to minorities who have the needed favors, including having a good sponsor to leverage the permission of the authorities, and thus exploit the radio spectrum in the city. But the process is simply an absurd attempt.
This business is in the hands of a few families, and those who dare to propose a program are classified as criminals, even if its proposal is submitted to the dissemination of socio-cultural alternatives.
In recent weeks, 3 radio stations have been victims of operating assumptions, in order to dismantle and remove them from the air. Justification is the social grievance, attempted sedition and provoking ideas. The testimony of those who were present during the raids, say the use of force was excessive, with foul language and threats against people who were in the buildings. Treated as common criminals, rebels, pinkos and not as journalists, subjected to force and intimidation by agents weapons prosecutors of "justice" carry these cases.
I wonder how necessary the use of repressive force to comply, which undoubtedly is their duty? Dialogue is the virtue of wise people who are willing to solve problems without going to show off his "power." We can not remain blind to this phenomenon, as contemplating the use of force against people who are not committing harm against others, as "normal" is another symptom of this serious disease that convulsed us as a country: intolerance. Do not forget that science produces virtue without fools and science without producing under tyrants. The mediocrity just causes a critical condition in the debate, freedom of speech and the proposals share a common space, looking for social welfare and most importantly, progress.
Comments: elliroforo@gmail.com